All of this sounds good. I'll probably only get to it tomarrow. I'll deploy the jars somewhere convenient for you to grab them. PS, would you mind signing my upcoming configuration.jar milestone as well? The key stuff seems to have totally beat me to a pulp in trying to get it to work on Windows.
Eric > -----Original Message----- > From: Henning P. Schmiedehausen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 13, 2004 9:54 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Any objection to posting Turbine 2.4 Milestone 1 > > > "Eric Pugh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >Hi guys.. > > >In the tradition of the Eclipse project and it's many many milestones, I > >wanted to see about publishing a 2.4 Milestone 1 tomorrow. > Basically, there > >are various projects that are using various flavors of Turbine 2.4. > > +1 Release early, release often is a good thing. As we do just a > milestone release, please remember to do a CVS tag so we can reproduce > the code that you have built the milestone from. > > If you send me the jars, I can sign them with the turbine release key > and put them onto the apache download servers. > > >Antelope, any META Turbine 2.4 flavor, and my personal copy of Scarab all > >come to mind. > > I want to make a "META_1_2" tag this weekend and put the plugin onto > ibiblio. It is about time IMHO. > > Scott, as you seem to be the lone Torque guy currently: Any objections > for calling a vote to release torque-3.1.1? I finally want to get an > "official" version of the Torque plugin out. > > I feel that it is time to do some maintenance releases of the various > Turbine branches for quite some time. However, I want to sort out the > commons-logging issue for the 2.3 branch before rolling a release. And > I would really like to have torque-3.1.1 (not 3.2-dev or HEAD!) in a > 2.3 relase. > > >It would be nice for people to have a version called > turbine-2.4-m1.jar that > >would be an explicit line in the sand in terms of features. It would > >include the pipeline, PipelineData, and everything else we have > done in 2.4. > > +1 > > >It won't include any changes/resolution to updating the Avalon container > >used in Turbine. It also won't include any of the new Fulcrum > equivalents > >to Turbine services that haven't already been integrated. > > We should also do a fulcrum milestone. I wouldn't want to see SNAPSHOT > references in the META flavor files. > > Regards > Henning > > > -- > Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH > [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/ > > RedHat Certified Engineer -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire > Linux, Java, perl, Solaris -- Consulting, Training, Development > > "Fighting for one's political stand is an honorable action, but re- > fusing to acknowledge that there might be weaknesses in one's > position - in order to identify them so that they can be remedied - > is a large enough problem with the Open Source movement that it > deserves to be on this list of the top five problems." > -- Michelle Levesque, "Fundamental Issues with > Open Source Software Development" > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
