"Eric Pugh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>I think the other element left for M2 was to maybe integrate a container..
>But, I may leave that for M3, and just focus on testing what I have for M2
>and then maybe tag it later this week. I may also try and get a vote out on
>some of the fulcrum components, and have them in a released state for adding
>to M2.
Which container do you want to use? I know that this is a very
sensitive subject ATM with the various Avalon people and now that
Niclas and Stephen made appearances @ turbine-dev, we should
definitely avoid being dragged into the avalonic wars.
Stick with ECM? Excalibur? Merlin? Make it pluggable? Is this possible
(chicken-egg problem?)
Regards
Henning
--
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/
RedHat Certified Engineer -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire
Linux, Java, perl, Solaris -- Consulting, Training, Development
"Fighting for one's political stand is an honorable action, but re-
fusing to acknowledge that there might be weaknesses in one's
position - in order to identify them so that they can be remedied -
is a large enough problem with the Open Source movement that it
deserves to be on this list of the top five problems."
-- Michelle Levesque, "Fundamental Issues with
Open Source Software Development"
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
