All the components in Fulcrum are not Turbine specific. Well, all but one glaring exception. Intake is turbine specific because of the parameter parser. And personally, I don't see Intake being used outside of Turbine.
What do you think of rolling it back into Turbine? It feels like part of what makes Turbine up. It isn't a generice validation framework by any means... I'll get the VOTE call out later today. Eric > -----Original Message----- > From: Henning P. Schmiedehausen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 2:00 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Ready to call for a vote on Fulcrum compoennts > > > "Eric Pugh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >Hi all, > > >I am ready to call for a vote on many of the fulcrum components. > Not sure > >how to do it, in mass or separately? I am afraid that > separately would be a > >lot of email! > > I'd write just one mail, short one line description of the Component, > what it does, whether it is Turbine specific or not and the version. > > Regards > Henning > > -- > Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH > [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/ > > RedHat Certified Engineer -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire > Linux, Java, perl, Solaris -- Consulting, Training, Development > > What is more important to you... > [ ] Product Security > or [ ] Quality of Sales and Marketing Support > -- actual question from a Microsoft customer survey > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
