Hi Eric,
Pleased to take a little from your plate :-) Thanks for your work.
I have merged splitted components: crypto, dvsl, factory, localization,
mimetype and pool. I removed all CVS info from components dirs and hope that
you will have no problems with committing. All components where tested, and
just localization failed:
test:test:
[junit] Running org.apache.fulcrum.localization.LocaleTokenizerTest
[junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0,491 sec
[junit] Running org.apache.fulcrum.localization.LocalizationTest
[junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 0,621 sec
[junit] [ERROR] TEST org.apache.fulcrum.localization.LocalizationTest FAILED
Because of "fail();" on line 88. If you will remove this call all tests pass
then.
As dev list is not accepting zips i will send a copy on your email.
Regards,
Kostya
> -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Eric Pugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 12. November 2004 11:19
> An: Turbine Developers List
> Betreff: RE: [REVOTE] Initial Release Fulcrum Components
>
> Glad to get the +1.. I have been working on cleaning up some of the
> docs and adding the javadocs on. The initial reelease sites will have
> those docs. I will look through the issues you highlighted.
>
> The api/impl split was pioneered/required by using Merlin.
> Merlin wanted a seperate jar for each. However, not all the
> components where merlinized. I would actually like to merge them back
> together, but have enough on my plate. If someone wanted to spend a
> couple hours doing it, it would be much appreciated.
>
> Eric
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Scott Eade [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 2:59 AM
> > To: Turbine Developers List
> > Subject: Re: [REVOTE] Initial Release Fulcrum Components
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >Vote:
> > >[X] +1
> > >[ ] +1 (but not on all, please see comments below) [ ] +0 [ ] -1
> > >
> > >Comments (I don't see any of the following as show stoppers):
> > >
> > * Is there some reason why some of the components are
> split between
> > an API and an Implementation in cvs (and project) but others
> > aren't? It just seems a little inconsistent.
> > * It would be great include the JavaDoc on the sites
> with a link to
> > it from the main pages (especially the empty ones), otherwise
> > there is often very little to see.
> > * bsf
> > o Usage information is actually for the GlobalCacheService
> > * cache
> > o Site hasn't been updated - last published 14 Feb 2004
> > * dvsl
> > o No usage info (you could cheat by removing the heading).
> > * naming
> > o The link "this document" results in a 404.
> > * parser (not included in vote)
> > o Perhaps this should be moved under a different heading
> > ("Sandbox")
> > * template (not included in vote)
> > o Sandbox?
> > * testcontainer
> > o Perhaps this should be moved under a different heading
> > ("Testing components")
> >
> > Excellent stuff.
> >
> > Scott
> >
> > --
> > Scott Eade
> > Backstage Technologies Pty. Ltd.
> > http://www.backstagetech.com.au
> >
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
