I agree. Maven the next version of so has a lot more information in the version, including tag information. I am debating on the Fulcrum front of moving things like the Turbine adapter for security back into Turbine CVS as an extension...
Eric > -----Original Message----- > From: Henning P. Schmiedehausen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 3:22 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: cvs commit: > jakarta-turbine-fulcrum/security/adapters/turbine project.xml > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > <artifactId>turbine</artifactId> > > - <version>2.3</version> > > - </dependency> > > + <!--version>2.3</version--> > > + <version>20041018.180618</version> > > + </dependency> > > *Cough*. And this is, where Maven (again) breaks down. Your > 20041018.180618 jar is newer than my 20041016.123304 jar but it is not > a 2.3 Branch jar, but a 2.4 Branch jar... > > This whole snapshot / time version jar business was a bad idea from > the start. > > Regards > Henning > > -- > Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH > [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/ > > RedHat Certified Engineer -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire > Linux, Java, perl, Solaris -- Consulting, Training, Development > > What is more important to you... > [ ] Product Security > or [ ] Quality of Sales and Marketing Support > -- actual question from a Microsoft customer survey > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
