Hi Siegfried,

I've had a deadline brought forward and sadly have to push forward using ECM until I can get some breathing space to continue with the switch to fortress.

I have a working service, with a dummy service in one of my applications, but no tests yet and no fulcrum services fully converted.

As there is going to be a delay, I could either :-

1. commit what is there into turbine tree, including configuration files with the fortress entries commented out.

2. Send same to you off-list for you to play with.

3. Leave things as they are until I have time to finish it.

Let me know which is preferable.

Regards,

Peter

Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
Hi Peter,

before you happily return to the computer after the long weekend ...

+) I fixed a SVN related problem with the fulcrum-resourcemanager-service
+) I updated the dependencies of the fulcrum-groovy-service in SVN as well
+) the Fulcrum build works with the avalon-framework-api/impl-4.3-dev but I did not commit this change +) within the next few days I commit a YAAFI version providing service interceptors whereas the interceptors are plain Avalon services +) I can also help with migrating to Fortress if you provide a Fortress adapter (well, at least at night)

Cheers,

Siegfried Goeschl


Peter Courcoux wrote:

Hi Siegfried,

Comments below:-

Siegfried Goeschl wrote:

Hi Peter,

see my comments below ...

Siegfried Goeschl

Peter Courcoux wrote:

Siegfried,

I've put an issue in jira regarding the fortress service and assigned it to me. I have a service working locally now and am just trying to build fulcrum with the fortress meta tags so I can use them within fortress for testing. I've also updated the maven-fortress-plugin so that it works for me with my build system.

Correct me if I'm wrong - is the usage of maven-fortress-plugin mandatory? I have problems with Maven builds requiring custom plugins since the tend to be broken when being used on multiple Maven versions and platforms.


There is an Ant task which does what is needed and which is simply called by the maven plugin. I'm not a maven expert. Maybe Eric could help on this.

I'm away from tomorrow until Monday evening and will not be making any further progress until then.

While I've been playing with fortress I have got no further switching services. One question for you, are you aware of any reason that might prevent us switching to the latest Avalon/excalibur dependencies for all the fulcrum components. They are at RC3 now and a vote has been called to release without change?




I give the new avalon-framework a try until Monday evening and commit the changes by then. When using Fortress container instead of YAAFI there is a liittle problem - each Avalon container comes with a different set of variables for the Avalon context. The Fulcrum services currently follow the Merlin conventionn but this is easy to change. And YAAFI supports Fortress context naming anyway using the <component-flavour> tag.

That helps.

Do you have an Turbine AvalonComponentService for Fortress up and running with the latest Fortress release?


Yes I'm using RC3 builds.


In answer to your question :

The follwoing services are still listed in the TurbineResources.properties file from cvs head

IIRC the intention was to convert all of the services listed below to fulcrum services and then use them in turbine 2.4. We will need to keep the old service framework in place with no changes to functionality while switching to the new services so that the old stuff can be deprecated and only removed from cvs head after release of 2.4.




I can leand a hand for services I know of since I never used Turbine for a web-application .... :-)

+) services.XmlRpcService.classname=org.apache.turbine.services.xmlrpc.TurbineXmlRpcService +) services.XSLTService.classname=org.apache.turbine.services.xslt.TurbineXSLTService +) services.UniqueIdService.classname=org.apache.turbine.services.uniqueid.TurbineUniqueIdService

Great.

Any volunteers for any of the others?


services.FactoryService.classname=org.apache.turbine.services.factory.TurbineFactoryService services.PoolService.classname=org.apache.turbine.services.pool.TurbinePoolService services.RunDataService.classname=org.apache.turbine.services.rundata.TurbineRunDataService services.ServletService.classname=org.apache.turbine.services.servlet.TurbineServletService services.AssemblerBrokerService.classname=org.apache.turbine.services.assemblerbroker.TurbineAssemblerBrokerService services.SchedulerService.classname=org.apache.turbine.services.schedule.TurbineSchedulerService services.XmlRpcService.classname=org.apache.turbine.services.xmlrpc.TurbineXmlRpcService services.UniqueIdService.classname=org.apache.turbine.services.uniqueid.TurbineUniqueIdService services.UploadService.classname=org.apache.turbine.services.upload.TurbineUploadService services.SecurityService.classname=org.apache.turbine.services.security.db.DBSecurityService services.PullService.classname=org.apache.turbine.services.pull.TurbinePullService services.TemplateService.classname=org.apache.turbine.services.template.TurbineTemplateService services.XSLTService.classname=org.apache.turbine.services.xslt.TurbineXSLTService services.VelocityService.classname=org.apache.turbine.services.velocity.TurbineVelocityService

Could I suggest that we use jira to keep track of what is being done. It looks like we could both be working on the fulcrum tree at the same time. (unless you finish all the conversion over the next four days, that is ;-) )

Agreed



I'll catch up with you next week. I'm off for a long weekend now.

Regards,

Peter


Regards,

Peter


Siegfried Goeschl wrote:

Hi folks,

are there any plans which existing Turbine services need to be migrated for the next Turbine milestone release? Currently the following Avalon-based services are currently used within Turbine CVS HEAD

  * org.apache.torque.avalon.Torque
  * org.apache.fulcrum.cache.GlobalCacheService
  * org.apache.fulcrum.mimetype.MimeTypeService
  * org.apache.fulcrum.crypto.CryptoService
  * org.apache.fulcrum.localization.LocalizationService
  * org.apache.fulcrum.intake.IntakeService
  * org.apache.fulcrum.factory.FactoryService

This is rather a proof of concept than anything else ... :-( .... as good condidates (where I can help) are XML-RPC and XSLT service

Cheers,

Siegfried Goeschl

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
------------------------------
Peter Courcoux
Telephone : +44 (0)1923 661488
Mobile    : 07880 605626
email     : [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to