I'm also waiting for its diskcache patch for a long time.
My project is still in build phase, if it could be soon it would be great.
I'm also thinking about other option, EHCache, if indexed disk cache
wouldn't work properly.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
02/04/2004 10:07 AM
Please respond to "Turbine JCS Users List"
To: "Turbine JCS Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: Re: Disk Cache Persistence
Christian,
I would also appreciate a copy of the diskcache patch too.
I'm begining to regret ever trying to use JCS but I'm in fairly deep now
;)
I'm trying to use a backup machine purely so that when the primary machine
goes down, other machines can still sync off a backup machine only I seem
to be having large problems with using 2 LTCP auxillaries in this
configuration.
I appear to get the wrong value for a given key after running for a while.
If I can get diskcache working over restarts this would mean i could make
the configuration much simpler and hopefully avoid some of the other
obscure
JCS bugs.
Kind regards,
Matt.
>-- Original Message --
>Reply-To: "Turbine JCS Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>From: Christian Kreutzfeldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Turbine JCS Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Disk Cache Persistence
>Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 00:22:32 +0200
>
>
>On Friday 02 April 2004 00:10, Baum, Karl wrote:
>> Hmmm that sounds very usefull. Why don't you contribute your addition
>> to JCS and EHCache?
>Why the heck should I post it another time? Sorry for being so rude, but
>I
>submitted the patch three times and no-one really realized that. I am
somewhat
>like angry about the people who are sitting on the project code. The
cache
>is really useful and the only reason why it can't be used in production
>environments is that the disk cache does not work as expected?!
>I would really appreciated it if JCS would be moved to jakarta / apache
>as an official project since it is a standalone project.
>
>Whom do I have to contact to make a clear statement about that?
>
>BTW, Corin is about to check the changes out. I don't know if they are
>really good, but they seem to fix the problem. I think that a review
>would be good and it would be also good to have some more people
>checking that bug. Beside that the JCS cache needs a profiling check....
>see the EHCache page and their hints that the JCS does have memory
>leaks.
>
>With regards,
> Christian
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*********************************************************************************
Important Note
This email (including any attachments) contains information which is
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not
the intended recipient you must not use, distribute or copy this
email. If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender immediately and delete this email. Any views expressed in this
email are not necessarily the views of AXA. Thank you.
*********************************************************************************
