I think we should undo this patch.

Any objections?
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Work:      http://www.multitask.com.au
Developers: http://adslgateway.multitask.com.au/developers




[EMAIL PROTECTED]
05/03/02 11:30 AM
Please respond to turbine-maven-dev

 
        To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        cc: 
        Subject:        cvs commit: jakarta-turbine-maven/src/templates/build 
build-gump.xml


jtaylor     02/05/02 18:30:14

  Modified:    src/templates/build build-gump.xml
  Log:
  GUMP was choking on that nag entry, looks like this is not the right 
file for
  it to go into. As usual, I am totally confused by GUMP so I'm pulling it 
out
  until I understand where it is supposed to go.
 
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.3       +0 -6 jakarta-turbine-maven/src/templates/build/build-gump.xml
 
  Index: build-gump.xml
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: 
/home/cvs/jakarta-turbine-maven/src/templates/build/build-gump.xml,v
  retrieving revision 1.2
  retrieving revision 1.3
  diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
  --- build-gump.xml             1 May 2002 14:59:13 -0000 1.2
  +++ build-gump.xml             3 May 2002 01:30:14 -0000 1.3
  @@ -35,10 +35,4 @@
 
     </target>
 
  -#if ( $project.build.nagEmailAddress )
  - 
  -  <nag from="$project.build.nagEmailAddress" 
to="$project.build.nagEmailAddress"/>
  -
  -#end
  - 
   </project>
 
 
 



Reply via email to