On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 05:32:08PM -0400, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-06-04 at 11:51, Vincent Massol wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Just a probably stupid question. Why do we need to ask Maven users to
> > have junit.jar in anthome/lib ? Couldn't we download it in the same way
> > as we download the other jars ?
> 
> It's a known problem with the <junit> task. It won't work unless it's in
> ANT_HOME/lib. I'm not sure why this can't be fixed but it has been like
> this for as long as I can remember (which isn't very long BTW :-)).

So -- why not include an ant distribution in Maven?  You could be sure
of the version of both ant and all the optional libraries which need to
be installed with it.  And it'd be easier to work with maven-style
projects, if you need a different version of ant for other projects.

We've done this with ant for a large, complex, internally-managed build
system at my company; and not having to worry about the ant which is
installed elsewhere OS made things much easier.

cheers --

Ed
-- 
   +=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=
   |   Ed Korthof   |  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  |   650-228-2527   |
   +=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to