Hi Hen, (copying to maven-user since it's not a development issue as such).
1) Agree. 2) From memory, projects without a <pomVersion> are implicitly pomVersion 1. I think this came in b2. Docs reflect cvs head. -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Work: http://www.multitask.com.au Developers: http://adslgateway.multitask.com.au/developers Henri Yandell <bayard@generatio To: Turbine Maven Developers List njava.com> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: 06/14/02 03:47 PM Subject: Documentation ideas Please respond to "Turbine Maven Developers List" Just a couple of things. 1) The documentation for things like the Project Description could do with a javadoc style 'since' bit. Like, in which version of POM did pomVersion turn up. 2) Which version of Maven does the current documentation support? What worries me is: Commons.Util is using Maven. I'm presuming it's using b4 [but that could so easily be a bad assumption]. The version it's using has a <version> tag in the <project> tag, but the documentation has no mention of this <version> tag. Do we have cvs-HEAD versionned documentation? Hen -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: < mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: < mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
