I remember adding a type to a dependency so that we could mark dependencies
as being of different named types (compile, test, documentation, build,
whatever).
Then we could use this flag either inside build scripts or even just on the
documentation page where we could describe which part of the system requires
a certain JAR etc.
Right now Dependency has a type property so now you can do
<dependency>
<id>foo</id>
<type>testing</type>
...
Jason, I seem to remember you had a better idea/vision of what to do with
this? Should we backout the type property and try another approach?
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
