On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 17:30, Brett Porter wrote: > if you don't apply the patch to maven.xml, then touchstone tests will > pass. Then the xdoc stuff can be tested with "maven site". > The maven.xml patch can be re-applied after the bug is fixed :) > > Alternatively, you could continue to have it fail, and make the "don't > run tests" property (can't remember off the top of my head) needed to > build HEAD?
I will do the former and then we can try to fix the bug. Thanks again! > Cheers, > Brett > > Jason van Zyl wrote: > > On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 16:30, Brett Porter wrote: > > > >>I don't know if this is the approach you wanted to take, but this > >>includes a currently failing test for xdoc. > >> > >>maven.xml for touchstone-build, and a tarball of an xdocs directory to > >>put under there too. > > > > > > Yes, definitely the right approach! Adding to the touchstone is ideal. > > But we have to figure out how to make the test pass as the touchstone is > > run after Maven's unit tests so the bootstrap will not go through unless > > the touchstone is successful. > > > > > >>Cheers, > >>Brett > >> > >>______________________________________________________________________ > > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
