Not quite sure what you mean..  I do have my Turbine app pretty much setup
with a similar directory structure to Scarab( actually it mirrors almost
perfectly the default newapp).

Now I am trying to bring the code base into Maven management...

So I put everything in webapp/myapp directory of Maven.  Cool.  Now, I want
to run my turbine app without having to create and deploy a war?

I am currently changing my server.conf to have my webapp root be my
webapp/myapp directory..  And then add some steps in so the compiled classes
get copied into my webapp/myapp directory...

I downloaded the beta7 of scarab, but didn't see a project.xml file in it..
Is Scarab using maven for builds?

Eric

-----Original Message-----
From: Jon Scott Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Turbine Maven Users List
Subject: Re: How do people set up Turbine apps using Maven?


on 5/13/02 11:31 AM, "Eric Pugh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I have been playing with the new J2EE support in Maven, and trying to get
it
> to work with a Turbine style app where you compile and run the java
classes
> "in site" so to speak, instead of deploying a war.  I don't want to create
a
> war file until deployment because it slows down Turbine development.  I
was
> thinking of doing something like setting up my web root to the target
> directory, and then keeping my java classes in /src/java...
>
> What have other people done?
>
> Eric

I don't understand why this doesn't work exactly like Scarab's method of
webapp development.

-jon


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to