"Glen Stampoultzis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/03/2002 12:43:37 AM:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/02/2002 05:35:44 > PM: > Glenn Stampoulis writes: > >> Absolutely. That's my current gripe with both Maven and Centipede. > Neither > >> is as flexible as straight ant. For example in Maven b4 simply > specifying > >> some system property for my tests cases requires me to modify Maven > >> directly. Not really desirable. > >Glenn, that's gotta be a bug. Can you give some more detail on the Maven > lists? > > I'm pretty sure it's not a bug. It just wasn't considered or was considered > and found to be hard to implement. Take a look at the build file for the > test plugin to see what I mean. Must've missed the discussion on that one :) We can take that up further on the maven lists if you like. > I'd be interested in learning more about what problems you believe Jelly > solves that Ant was unable to. Access to objects as properties without writing code. -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Work: http://www.multitask.com.au Developers: http://adslgateway.multitask.com.au/developers
