I was about to start on this, but it looks like the current codebase
does not compile:
[javac]
C:\src\jakarta\jakarta-turbine-torque\src\java\org\apache\torque\Torque.
java:95: org.apache.torque.Torque should be declared abstract; it does
not define configure(org.apache.stratum.configuration.Configuration) in
org.apache.torque.Torque
[javac] public class Torque implements Initializable, Configurable
[javac] ^
[javac] 1 error
Jeff Schnitzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Dobbs
Sent: Wed 4/17/2002 2:35 PM
To: Turbine Torque Developers List
Cc:
Subject: Re: Vector?
On Wednesday, April 17, 2002, at 02:25 PM, Jeff Schnitzer
wrote:
> Why is Vector used prolifically? Is this just an anachronism?
>
> Vector has synchronized methods, which are slow, and as a
concrete
> implementation class it doesn't offer a whole lot of
flexibility for
> novel implementation strategies (like backing a List with a
ResultSet
> directly).
>
> Is it just a question of spending the time to do a
search/replace on the
> code? If so, I'll be happy to volunteer. I notice that
there are
> several Java2 collections in the code already, so nobody is
trying to
> keep compatibility with JDK 1.1. Since 3.0 is a major
release, it seems
> like this would be the best time to make any major interface
changes.
The last time this question was asked, Dan replied that the
issue had
already been voted on and approved, but no one ever did the
work. I've
been here for almost a year-and-a-half and that vote happened
before I
got here.
So that's long over due. Have at it.
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<<winmail.dat>>
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
