Why not getLog() or getLogger()? I realize that log() is a nice, short name, but it implies action when in fact all it does it return a logger object. The getXxx() pattern is more appropriate.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > jmcnally 02/04/26 16:28:27 > > Modified: src/java/org/apache/torque/om BaseObject.java > Log: > less code > > Revision Changes Path > 1.10 +2 -9 >jakarta-turbine-torque/src/java/org/apache/torque/om/BaseObject.java > > Index: BaseObject.java > =================================================================== > RCS file: >/home/cvs/jakarta-turbine-torque/src/java/org/apache/torque/om/BaseObject.java,v > retrieving revision 1.9 > retrieving revision 1.10 > diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10 > --- BaseObject.java 26 Apr 2002 22:18:06 -0000 1.9 > +++ BaseObject.java 26 Apr 2002 23:28:27 -0000 1.10 > @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ > * > * @author <a href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">Frank Y. Kim</a> > * @author <a href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">John D. McNally</a> > - * @version $Id: BaseObject.java,v 1.9 2002/04/26 22:18:06 jmcnally Exp $ > + * @version $Id: BaseObject.java,v 1.10 2002/04/26 23:28:27 jmcnally Exp $ > */ > public abstract class BaseObject implements Persistent, Serializable > { > @@ -433,17 +433,10 @@ > */ > protected Category log() > { > - Category log = null; > - if (this.log == null) > + if (log == null) > { > log = Category.getInstance(getClass().getName()); > - this.log = log; > } > - else > - { > - log = this.log; > - } > - > return log; > } > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
