Why not getLog() or getLogger()?  I realize that log() is a nice,
short name, but it implies action when in fact all it does it return
a logger object.  The getXxx() pattern is more appropriate.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

> jmcnally    02/04/26 16:28:27
>
>   Modified:    src/java/org/apache/torque/om BaseObject.java
>   Log:
>   less code
>   
>   Revision  Changes    Path
>   1.10      +2 -9      
>jakarta-turbine-torque/src/java/org/apache/torque/om/BaseObject.java
>   
>   Index: BaseObject.java
>   ===================================================================
>   RCS file: 
>/home/cvs/jakarta-turbine-torque/src/java/org/apache/torque/om/BaseObject.java,v
>   retrieving revision 1.9
>   retrieving revision 1.10
>   diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10
>   --- BaseObject.java 26 Apr 2002 22:18:06 -0000      1.9
>   +++ BaseObject.java 26 Apr 2002 23:28:27 -0000      1.10
>   @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@
>     *
>     * @author <a href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Frank Y. Kim</a>
>     * @author <a href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>John D. McNally</a>
>   - * @version $Id: BaseObject.java,v 1.9 2002/04/26 22:18:06 jmcnally Exp $
>   + * @version $Id: BaseObject.java,v 1.10 2002/04/26 23:28:27 jmcnally Exp $
>     */
>    public abstract class BaseObject implements Persistent, Serializable
>    {
>   @@ -433,17 +433,10 @@
>         */
>        protected Category log()
>        {
>   -        Category log = null;
>   -        if (this.log == null) 
>   +        if (log == null) 
>            {
>                log = Category.getInstance(getClass().getName());
>   -            this.log = log;
>            }
>   -        else 
>   -        {
>   -            log = this.log;
>   -        }
>   -        
>               return log;
>        }
>    
>   
>   
>   
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to