Not much, for the most part, you could copy one of the other implementations and just modify what needs changing. Like for an auto_inc enabled db, you could copy the mysql or ms sql server implementation and just change a few things. And for sequences, copy the oracle one. We don't have test cases to run it against yet, but that would probably be pretty helpful in making new implementations.
Travis ---- Original Message ---- From: Eric Dobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: 2002-04-29 To: Turbine Torque Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Why I don't like Criteria (was Re: Crossdb and Criteria Patch) On Monday, April 29, 2002, at 10:41 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > So basically, what I've done here is proven that you could keep > backwards compatability with people using Criteria, and at the same > time, you could allow complex querying by using Crossdb (and database > independence at runtime). Cool trick. What would you say is the amount of work needed to create an implementation for one additional database? (see o.a.t.adaptor.* for the list of dbs currently supported by Torque). -Eric -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
