Eric Dobbs wrote: > On Tuesday, April 30, 2002, at 10:23 PM, Sam Joseph wrote: > >> So I managed to get GROUP BY and HAVING functionality working in >> Torque by making some slight modifications to Criteria, Query, and >> BasePeer. My code is working against MySQL and MsSQL, >> >> I know I need this functionality for my application. Do we want to >> support this? Do we know how consistence this SQL is across other >> databases? > > > GROUP BY and HAVING are both pretty consistent. > Send along a patch. 8^)
Sure. Although I would probably need to check out the latest version of cvs torque to create a proper patch. Is there some way that I can handle holding on to other changes that I've made that haven't been accepted as patches (such as my Criterion String parsing routines and making SqlEnum public) without having to re-edit all the files? I mean if I update my cvs copy of torque then I'll get loads of conflict marked up files right? Will I have to go through resolving those same conflicts every time? I'm guessing I'll have to, which doesn't encourage me to work on creating new patches .... hmmm CHEERS> SAM -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
