Thanks for the note. Sounds like a good plan. The patch is handy for my work in the meantime, regardless.
Question -- will there be a default adapter, suitable for use when the user doesn't specify one? That would remove some confusing error messages. Incidentally, on a similar note, it would be nice if a useful error message is given when the user name, password, or database URL are incorrect. Currently a null exception is thrown instead. Best, WILL -----Original Message----- From: John McNally [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 1:43 PM To: Turbine Torque Developers List Subject: Re: patches -- backlog? On the patch to add back the adapter property, I have some code in the works to remove torque's embedded connection pool and use standard jdbc2 DataSources in its place. I thought I would have that done by today, but it touched a bit more code than I originally thought. When I check in this change, the way torque's pool is configured will be separated from the choice of adapter. The adapter will be set as a property similar to your proposal, but it will have no relationship to drivers. Not sure I will have time to get this in this week, but if not I will make another effort next weekend. john mcnally On Mon, 2002-05-13 at 12:58, Will Glass-Husain wrote: > Hi, > > I submitted a couple of patches about 10 days ago to this list. One of them > is in response to a question I've seen on the list a few times (and is in a > Buzilla note as well). Specifically, it is a patch to DBFactory that > reinstates the "adapter" property, allowing users to use any database driver > with Torque. (Currently, there is a list of drivers hard coded, but other > drivers are not allowed). This is particularly important patch for those > using the Sun ODBC-JDBC driver, which may be used with multiple databases. > > The other patches are various changes to the SQL templates. For Microsoft > SQL, they fix an important bug. (currently, the create table SQL for MS SQL > doesn't work with multiple tables or with date fields). > > Just curious where those patches stands. Is there a backlog of things to > do, and the committers just haven't caught up, or is there a problem with > the patches themselves? > > The patches are at: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00219.h > tml > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00220.h > tml > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00221.h > tml > > Let me know if I can help with anything. > > Best, WILL > > > _______________________________________ > Forio Business Simulations > Will Glass-Husain > (415) 440-7500 phone > (415) 235-4293 mobile > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.forio.com > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
