No. that one uses object pools from commons-pool. The one that is based on the old code is TorqueDataSourceFactory.
john mcnally On Mon, 2002-06-03 at 16:19, Daniel Rall wrote: > John McNally <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Yes. I moved the jndi stuff into a "factory" implementation and then > > created a couple more implementations that are a bit easier to > > configure. One is the updated "classic" torque pool. The other is the > > one James shows below. > > > > If you have some other pool or you do not want to use properties to set > > up the pool, you could just write a custom factory that initialized your > > pool in whatever way you want. > > Is the Jdbc2PoolDataSourceFactory the refactored classic pool which > moved into the Commons? If so, I'd probably like to use that. > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
