"Stephen Haberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Two questions as I'm playing with build-torque.xml. > > Is there a strong requirement for the project- prefix in the target > names? If I put together a cool, standalone-enabled build-torque.xml, > can it remove all of the project- prefixes? I know it's not that big of > a deal, but I don't see the point and so find it a bit annoying.
I'm not particularly fond of them, but you'll need to keep deprecated versions of them around for backwards compatibility which delegate to the new versions (and perhaps print a message indicating the deprecation). > The taskdefs are located in each target and sometimes defined multiple > times through the file. Would it be okay to move all of the taskdefs to > the beginning of the file, e.g. after the torque-classpath declaration? > I think it'd be cleaner to just define them once and make each of the > subsequent targets smaller and easier to read. Good cleanup, +1. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
