I would prefer that the access modifier for the methods in the BaseXXX classes be configurable. The developer can then decide whether they want an open api, or choose to override and open access to particular methods.
john mcnally On Mon, 2002-07-22 at 08:39, Stephen Haberman wrote: > Also, something I'd like to see is that instead of Xxx just blindly > inheriting from BaseXxx, being able to aggregate it. > > So if, say aggregateBase=true, Xxx would be created with a data member > of BaseXxx and the wrapper methods for all of the public methods > generated. > > Then users could go through and cut out the methods they don't want > visible to the outside world, but they could still use themselves within > the business logic via the BaseXxx data member. > > Sound like a good idea? > > Thanks, > Stephen > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
