on 7/29/02 6:48 PM, "Martin Jericho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> So the reason that Torque was designed with Lists in the first place is
> because of the same limitation in the underlying village infrastructure.
> I'm not familiar with what village is and who owns it (I only found
> information about dogs on the village.workingdogs.com website!).  Aren't
> village and torque the same project now?  Wouldn't it be easiest to add the
> functionality to village first to avoid the weaknesses you mentioned?

The website is:

share.whichever.com not village.workingdogs.com

And Village is 'owned' by the people who work on it (including myself)...

-jon


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to