Henning, I've been trying to catch you for days to ask you a couple of questions about your SecurityService proposal in fulcrum cvs HEAD.
1. Can you please summarise the changes that your code introduces? I am particularly interested in knowing how this affects the ability to extend the TurbineUser table. 2. What is the status of your proposal? It looks to me like the code would have been moved from a proposal to the actual implementation by now, except that there may have been some concern with regards to other suggested work on the security service (which doesn't seem to have materialized). Of concern to me is the difficulty in extending TurbineUser. I need to be able to do this before I can migrate to turbine 2.2. Judging by the list activity this is of critical importance to many others also. I am happy to contribute to this effort in terms of documentation or whatever else is necessary (time permitting). Cheers, Scott -- Scott Eade Backstage Technologies Pty. Ltd. http://www.backstagetech.com.au -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
