> 1 - Data Model Relationships > defining foreign-key-like relationships in the object model that are > not existant or created in the database. What I want is for the OM > access methods to be generated for this type of access, even if it > does not explicitly exist in the database as a fk.
I like the schema being as close to the database as possible, so I'd be against adding any extra generation information. This is what the extension classes are for. Generally if you're going to do this type of stuff, it's good database design to use a fk anyway. > 2 - "javaName" attribute for relationships (FK and above) > providing a "javaName" attribute to foreign-key (and the above > mentioned relationships) to allow control of the generated accessor > method names: I like this idea. The javaName pollutes the db-only schema, but we already use it extensively in the rest of the schema. What to entire a feature request for it into http://scarab.werken.com:8080/issues? - Stephen -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
