Well, I did the Interface Stuff, because I think it is a good design 
approach. Under OJB you can load all objects implementing one interface, 
and therefor we need this stuff for a project.
At 18:50 27.09.2002 -0500, you wrote:
>Okay, this looks good. I did change the BaseXxx -> Xxx and Xxx ->
>ExtensionXxx per the existing convention in the om templates.
>
>I have a question though, XxxProxyInterface is generate on condition of
>ojbUseProxy, which makes sense. But then XxxInterface is always
>generated. Do OJB users always need this XxxInteface to be generated? Or
>should it be done if !ojbUseProxy? Or should a new variable to be added,
>ojbUseInteface?
>
>Unless OJB users will always want the XxxInterface, we should do either
>the 2nd or 3rd option.
>
>- Stephen
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Markus M. May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 1:30 PM
> > To: Turbine Torque Developers List
> > Subject: RE: [patch] ojb templates
> >
> > The Interface and the ProxyInterface are used if you set ojbUseProxy
>in
> > your Properties. This is used for a dynamic proxy mapping. Anyway, I
>would
> > like to apply another patch, which defines the same Class structure as
>the
> > default OM Model of Torque. This means that there is a BaseObject and
>an
> > Object. And the Object is not touched, if it is already there.
> >
> >
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, 
>e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>For additional commands, e-mail: 
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

---+++--------------------+++---------------------+++---
Markus M. May
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Provide you with free J2EE projects

Please use my public key at:
http://www.javafreedom.org/mmay_javafreedom_org.key
---+++--------------------+++---------------------+++---


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to