On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 20:48, Quinton McCombs wrote: > > Issue TRQS94 has just been modified by user quintonm > > You can view the issue detail at the following URL: > <http://scarab.werken.com/issue/id/TRQS94> > > The following modifications were made to this issue: > > Switching to the jdbc2 pool has fixed this problem for me as well. >
Is there any reason to continue supporting the Torque pool? Seems like it ought to be dropped. -james -- James A. Hillyerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Java Software Engineer - http://www.whynotown.com/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
