I haven't tried the Manager stuff, is it ready for prime time? -james
On Fri, 2002-05-17 at 14:38, Jon Scott Stevens wrote: > on 5/17/02 2:27 PM, "James A. Hillyerd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I have a few options: > > > > 1. Code custom retrieveByXXX methods for each of my Objects, that either > > duplicate the code in the PK method, or call it and catch the exception. > > (I don't like either, duplicating code is bad, and so is unnecessary > > exceptions) > > > > 2. Modify places where I use the PK method to catch the exception. (More > > unnecessary exceptions) > > > > 3. Modify Torque to return null (or so that it is an option in > > build.properties). > > > > > > I think that each of the above options would take a similar amount of > > effort to implement. Can anyone give me reasons for or against > > modifying Torque? The only thing I could think of is if Torque uses the > > retrieveByPK methods internally and depends on them never returning > > null. > > If you are using the new Managers code, then you just do: > > FooManager.getInstance(Numberkey) > > -jon > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- [] James A. Hillyerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Java Software Engineer [] PGP 1024D/D31BC40D F87B 7906 C0DA 32E8 B8F6 DE23 FBF6 4712 D31B C40D -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
