Wes, I am fairly sure the answer to your question is No. Wouldn't it be much easier to not use the Oracle reserved words in MS SQL as well? This way you would have consistent column names across platforms, thereby making administration and maintenance easier. It would also mean that you could use torque without making what would be IMHO a rather crazy change (crazy because of the confusion that might result).
HTH, Scott > From: Wesley Gamble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Turbine Torque Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 17:36:42 -0500 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Does Torque allow table/column names to vary by platform? > > All, > > Thanks in advance for any help. > > I am in the middle of an application port to Oracle and we have several > namespace collisions with Oracle reserved words (duh!). > I looked at Torque a few weeks ago and quite liked it. However, it > appeared that it did not support mapping an object or attribute to multiple > table/column names which could vary by platform. > > For example, an object's attribute which mapped to <table>.UID in MS SQL > Server is fine, but in Oracle, the column must be named differently > because UID is a reserved word in Oracle. So I'd like to be able to map > the same attribute to both <table>.UID and <table>.<something_not_UID> > > Is this possible with the current rev. of Torque? > > If not, perhaps I should work on that :). > > Thanks, > Wes Gamble > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
