That could be.  That was just the only difference I saw between our code.
I'll look over your code closer in a little bit.


Tobin Juday
Software Engineer
proud graduate of The Ohio State University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 614.564.4192
Pager: 877.546.0103

The #1 Way to Pay Online
http://www.checkfree.com/paybillsonline



                                                                                       
                                                
                      [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                                
                                                
                      om                       To:       "Turbine Torque Users List" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>          
                                               cc:                                     
                                                
                      08/27/2002 02:20         Subject:  RE: Transaction               
                                                
                      PM                                                               
                                                
                      Please respond to                                                
                                                
                      "Turbine Torque                                                  
                                                
                      Users List"                                                      
                                                
                                                                                       
                                                
                                                                                       
                                                





Actually the "Oracle" in my code is the name with which my database is
configured in the properties file.

Also if that were an issue, I wouldn't get the connection object in the
first place.





                      tsjuday@checkfree

                      .com                     To:       "Turbine Torque
Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                                               cc:

                      08/27/02 11:15 AM        Subject:  RE: Transaction

                      Please respond to

                      "Turbine Torque

                      Users List"








I don't know if this is the issue, but I think you're supposed to have

      conn = Transaction.begin(OneOfYourTablesPeer.DATABASE_NAME);

instead of

      conn = Transaction.begin("Oracle");

I am using Oracle also, and that is how I have it working.


Tobin Juday
Software Engineer
proud graduate of The Ohio State University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 614.564.4192
Pager: 877.546.0103

The #1 Way to Pay Online
http://www.checkfree.com/paybillsonline




                      [EMAIL PROTECTED]

                      om                       To:       "Turbine Torque
Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                                               cc:

                      08/27/2002 02:10         Subject:  RE: Transaction

                      PM

                      Please respond to

                      "Turbine Torque

                      Users List"








actually that was another user on the list....

here's the code I am using for beta 4

  public static void testTorque(){
    Connection conn = null;

    try{

        //conn = BasePeer.beginTransaction("Oracle");
        conn = Transaction.begin("Oracle");

        //do criteria
        Criteria crit = new Criteria();
        crit.add(TEcommCategoryPeer.STATUS,"Pending");
        List cats = TEcommCategoryPeer.doSelect(crit);
        Iterator i = cats.iterator();
        while(i.hasNext()){
          TEcommCategory cat = (TEcommCategory)i.next();
          cat.setStatus("Tanay");
          cat.save(conn);
        }

        //do items
        crit.clear();
        crit.add(TEcommItemPeer.STATUS,"Pending");
        List items = TEcommItemPeer.doSelect(crit);

        if(items.size()<1000){
          throw new Exception("Test Torque Exception");
        }

        Iterator j = items.iterator();
        while(j.hasNext()){
          TEcommItem item = (TEcommItem)j.next();
          item.setStatus("Tanay");
          item.save(conn);
        }

        //BasePeer.commitTransaction(conn);
        Transaction.commit(conn);

        System.out.println("COMMMITED SUCSESSFULLY");
    }
    catch(Exception e){
      e.printStackTrace(System.out);
      //do a roll back
      try {
        //BasePeer.rollBackTransaction(conn);
        Transaction.rollback(conn);

        System.out.println("ROLLED BACK SUCSESSFULLY");
      }
      catch (Exception ex) {
        ex.printStackTrace(System.out);
      }

    }

  }



Everything appears to work as expected - I get the "ROLLED BACK
SUCSESSFULLY" message printed on the console...
however when I check the database..I see that the updates did get committed
to the tables.

Note: However one quirky thing that I do notice is that the commits don't
happen instantly.. when I run this code and immediately go and check the
database..it appears that the rollbacks DID happen and the database did not
get updated..... however when I go and check again after a few minutes..the
database seems to have got updated which means that the rollbacks didn't
work....
I'm not sure why the delay is there...

thanks












                      "Stephen

                      Haberman"                To:       "'Turbine Torque
Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                      <stephenh@chase30        cc:

                      00.com>                  Subject:  RE: Transaction


                      08/27/02 10:43 AM
                      Please respond to

                      "Turbine Torque

                      Users List"







You replied to a message that just said it worked (unless they were not
using b4, but I will assume they were). How are you using the
transaction and why does it not work?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 12:40 PM
> To: Turbine Torque Users List
> Subject: Re: Transaction
>
>
> Did transaction work for you in beta 4 ??
> It still does not for me....
>
> has anyone else tried any transaction related stuff with beta 4 ?
>
> thanks
>
>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>







--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>







--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>







--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>







--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to