I've seen a number of discussions on the list lately regarding OJB and the
future of Torque especially with respect to OJB.  Is there somewhere a good
comparison of why I should use one vs. the other?

I've been using Torque because I like its code generation feature.  I
realize it's not as sophisticated as some other solutions--in particular,
how it handles many-to-many relations is kinda clunky--but it gets the job
done fast, and it's far better than the solution it replaced (many
hand-coded, Peer-like persistence manager classes.)

Is there a good reason to switch from Torque to OJB?  Or should I just go
straight for EJB and container-managed persistence?

-- Bill



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to