Jon Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> on 5/31/01 4:46 PM, "Daniel Rall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> Actually, looking at this further (and discussing with jvz), this isn't a
> >> bug, it is the way that that method need to be implemented because of what
> >> it does. This is a very isolated case and is not a reflection of the overall
> >> Services architecture. My statement about services inherently being
> >> singletons still stands.
> >
> > It needs a fat comment, then.
>
> No. It needs to be removed eventually.
Yes, definitely. But until then...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
