On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 05:37:16PM -0700, Jon Stevens wrote:
> In either case, #1, must be executed so that one can control the type of
> status response (301 or 302).
Why does Turbine only honour 301 and 302? What about other codes? For
example, 303, 305 and 307 (are there others?). They may not be
understood by HTTP/1.0 browsers, but some people may have a restricted
usage where only HTTP/1.1 browsers (or other software) is going to
access the resources and it would be good to do things the modern
fashion rather than the backward-compatible fashion. It would seem
trivial to add these to the conditional clause, yet they have not
been. Is this intentional, or just an oversight?
Perhaps it would be good to put some of the turbine-user queries and
responses into the FAQ, and make the FAQ easier to find.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
