on 8/9/01 8:55 PM, "Rodney Schneider" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am hoping what you meant is "security implemented solely through > obscurity is no security". > > Obscurity can aid security: > > http://securityportal.com/beale/beale20010720.html Oh geeezz...lame article. He sounds like he is trying to justify it...there is no justification for attempting to use obscurity to aid in security in any shape or form. Security is not defined in shades of grey. It is very black or white IMHO. -jon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Turbine servlet extension mapping? Ariff Sidi
- Re: Turbine servlet extension mapping? Jon Stevens
- RE: Turbine servlet extension mapping? Ariff Sidi
- Re: Turbine servlet extension mapping? John McNally
- Re: Turbine servlet extension mapping? Jon Stevens
- Re: Turbine servlet extension mapping? Alex McLintock
- RE: Turbine servlet extension mapping? Ariff Sidi
- RE: Turbine servlet extension mapping? Philip Posgate
- Re: Turbine servlet extension mapping? Jon Stevens
- Re: Turbine servlet extension mapping? Rodney Schneider
- RE: Turbine servlet extension mapping? Jon Stevens
- RE: Turbine servlet extension mapping? Gareth Coltman
- RE: Turbine servlet extension mapping? Rodney Schneider
- Re: Turbine servlet extension mapping? Gunnar R�nning
- Re: Turbine servlet extension mapping? Jon Stevens
- Re: Turbine servlet extension mapping? Alex McLintock
- RE: Turbine servlet extension mapping? Gareth Coltman
- Re: Turbine servlet extension mapping? Eric Dobbs
- RE: Turbine servlet extension mapping? Gareth Coltman
