Well I guess that's a resounding "Yep, you don't get it..." :)

Can you describe an instance when this would be necessary? I have read the 
document, but still don't think I could put this to use productively.

Thanks again...


>From: John McNally <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Inheritance in Torque/Peers
>Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 15:09:49 -0700
>
>Torque supports only the one table per class hierarchy style of o-r
>mapping.  The <inheritance> tag is an element of <column> not <table>.
>It marks the column as distinguishing the different classes that are
>stored within the table.  Leaving the extends attribute out will have
>the class extend the highest level class, the extends attribute can lead
>to a deeper hierarchy.
>
>Jonathan Porterfield wrote:
> >
> > I'm not sure I totally get this, so can someone please check my
> > understanding of the usage from my example below?
> >
> > Would this be the correct way to define inheritance between a base user
> > table and an authors table in the database definition...
> >
> > Where the two tables have the following definition.
> > ------------       ------------
> > |   USERS    |---o-|   AUTHORS  |
> > -------------      ------------
> >
> > <app-data>
> >
> > <database name=MyData>
> >
> >   <table name="USERS" idMethod="idbroker">
> >     <column name="USERID" inheritance="single" type="INTEGER" size="4"
> > primaryKey="true"/>
> >         <inheritance key="AUTHORS" class="AUTHORS"
> > extends="com.mycompany.project.om.USERS"/>
> >     <column name="USER_NAME" type="VARCHAR" size="255" />
> >   </table>
> >
> >   <table name="AUTHORS" idMethod="idbroker" >
> >     <column name="AUTHORID" type="INTEGER" size="4" primaryKey="true"
> > required="true"/>
> >     <column name="USERID" type="INTEGER" size="4" />
> >     <column name="AUTHOR_BIO" type="VARCHAR" size="255"/>
> >     <foreign-key foreighTable="USERS">
> >       <reference foreign=  local=>
> >     </foreign-key>
> >   </table>
> >
> > </database>
> >
> > </app-data>
> > ------------------
> > Here, AUTHORS extends USERS so...
> > 1) Criteria crit = new Criteria();
> >    AuthorsPeer.doSelect(crit);
> >
> >    should fetch
> >    - USERID, USER_NAME, AUTHORID, AUTHOR_BIO
> >
> >    (T/F)?
> >
> > 2) And by the same token, and although it would be unconventional, it 
>would
> > be possible to use
> >    Criteria crit = new Criteria();
> >    crit.add (AuthorsPeer.UserName,"Ralph Malph");
> >    Object o = CategoryPeer.doInsert (crit);
> >
> >    to add a "Ralph Malph" user to the USERS table
> >    (T/F)?
> >
> > 3) Will this also create a row in the AUTHORS table?
> >
> > 4) Question - If inheritance is defined, is foreign-key definition 
>redundant
> > to the point of uselessness?
> >
> > 5) I see in the DTD that the attribute "extends" of the element
> > "inheritance" is optional (#IMPLIED).
> >    What would be the effect of removing the extends attribute from the
> > inheritance attribute in the example above?
> >
> > Thanks in advance for any response
> > -Cheers
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at 
>http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to