Adam Sherman wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 04:21:31PM -0400, Adam Sherman wrote: > > Forgive me for asking questions without reading all the docs! > > Says he. )-: > > > It seems that Turbine's OM does *not* support transactions at all? > > This is correct? > > Yes it does! I just noticed. > > > Should I be looking at something for transaction support? Or should I > > be changing the design of my app? > > OK, so then: is it possible to use BLOBs *inside transactions* in > Torque/Turbine?
Yes. BasePeer and the user om classes provide examples on its use, since turbine's user table contains a blob and there is code there to compensate for postgresql's transaction requirement regarding blob columns. > > I guess that becomes the final question. And if *not*, what should I > do? (Opinions please!) > > Thanks, > > A. > > -- > Adam Sherman > President & Technology Architect > Tritus Consultant Group Inc. > +1.613.255.5164 > http://www.tritus.ca > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
