Hi, newbee here :-) I went back 3 months of list archives and couldn't find a mention of this, but I'll apologize in advance if it's been discussed before.
Playing around with Torque (cool stuff dudes!) and have a question about the OM generated classes. I prefer to keep my auto-generated and human generated source files in separate directory trees, therefore I modified the om/Control.vm template and commented out the calls to ExtensionObject and ExtensionPeer so that the skeleton sub-classes don't get generated. I'll simply write them myself in a separate directory tree and compile both directory trees together. All is fine and dandy until I find that the Base classes won't compile without the sub-classes. Is there a reason that BaseFooEntity has multiple references to it's sub-class (FooEntity) or is this a template bug? This seems to be true of all the Base classes. They all depend on their skeleton sub-classes. Thanks, -Robert -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
