On 12/3/01 2:20 AM, "Kelvin Tan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What I actually really like about Fulcrum (or the Turbine services > framework) is really the design of it, ie interfaces and base > implementations (basically everything in src/core minus TurbineServices, > though it serves as an excellent reference implementation). I suppose this > is what you say hasn't experienced much change since Turbine. > > I may be simplifying things, but if I wanted to use this core as a > stand-alone (plugging in my own implementations), would it be simply looking > at how Turbine.init() works and basically mimicking the service > initialization?
Yup. Right now you have to hand it a configuration (Right now an ExtendedProperties object, this will change to an interface) and it needs some log4j info. Look in the turbine-3 code for details. > Sure. Is the eventual goal to produce a stand-alone services framework > though? Yes! > Kelvin > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- jvz. Jason van Zyl http://tambora.zenplex.org http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria http://jakarta.apache.org/commons -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
