On 12/18/01 6:50 AM, "Kelvin Tan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Is Aaron's package Torque-specific or a generic cache package? >> >> General tool. > > Hmmm... > > Do you anticipate any problems with implementing it in Torque then, based on > the concern raised below? I don't know yet. Torque isn't released and there may certainly be some problems but we'll come to that bridge when we get there. > >>> However, due to the way Torque's business objects are created, after the >>> business objects have been returned to the calling code, a cache is >>> effectively useless since invoking something like book.getAuthor() > basically >>> makes a direct database request, bypassing the cache (_unless_ the cache >>> sits between the objects and its peers, which would make it pretty >>> Torque-specific and involve extensive modifications to Torque code, I >>> think). >>> > > Kelvin > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- jvz. Jason van Zyl http://tambora.zenplex.org http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria http://jakarta.apache.org/commons -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
