Hi John,
We noticed the problem you mention below (two setters first one found is
used (not always correct one)) in the 2.2 src from a couple of weeks ago.
Could you (pretty please?) confirm your fix is in the latest 2.2 src? This
would help resolve a workaround I had to implement for a colleague which
meant having the method in question public whilst the others were protected
(if I remember it correctly).
Thx
/Colin
> I have modified the version of intake in fulcrum so that it looks up the
> getter first. It suffers from the limitation that there must always be
> a getter/setter pair, however. This is not a problem for the torque
> generated objects as this is always true, but it is annoying to have to
> create a setter in other objects when it is not used. I believe this
> fix should be in the 2.x tree as well.
>
> john mcnally
>
> Phillip Rhodes wrote:
> >
> > I have been having troubles with my generated classes from torque and
> > finally figured out what was wrong.
> >
> > All the facts...using the TDK out the box, but get this, using the
taglibs
> > from struts. The taglibs "bean" uses an object name and property name
to
> > look up the object in the specified scope and write out the property
> > value. It uses reflection for this. However they did reflection, it
won't
> > work always for overloaded methods. From my understanding it's a
> > limitation of reflection vs. the struts implementation. That's why I am
here.
> >
> > Here is from the java.sun.com reflection FAQ:
> > If a class has an overloaded method, does the Method.invoke() method use
> > the types of the arguments to select which method will be invoked?
> > No. Method.invoke() is always invoked on a specific overloading of the
> > method, previously selected by a call to Class.getMethod() or by other
> > means. The Reflection API does not automatically choose between
overloadings.
> >
> > Reflection (introspection) will not work well if there is method
> > overloading in a class. In torque generated classes, there is
> > overloading. Has anyone had problems with this? is there a work
> > around? I don't want to customize my torque generated classes!
> >
> > Example...
> >
> > public void setScaleId(String v ) throws Exception
> > {
> > setScaleId(new NumberKey(v));
> > }
> > public void setScaleId(NumberKey v ) throws Exception
> > {
> > ....
> > }
> >
> > Thanks... I will be able to contribute to others want I am up to speed
> > with turbine.
> >
> > _________________________________________________________
> >
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> >
> > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
