Sounds interesting. I will read up on it.
Thanks,
Ray
"Gonzalo A. Diethelm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
01/03/02 02:50 PM
Please respond to "Turbine Users List"
To: "Turbine Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: (bcc: Ray Grieselhuber/Teamwork)
Subject: RE: Turbine Questions
> As I said, I'm not trying to start a debate, but I'd like to press my
> argument a little further, so that I am convinced. Velocity
> definitely does seem to be a much cleaner implementation that
> many of the other frameworks that I have seen. The reasons that I think
> XML/XSL has an advantage over these types of projects, however,
> are listed below:
[snip]
Just to add more information, you CAN use Turbine to process XML/XSL.
There is an XML service that allows you to process an XML stream with
an XSL template and generate HTML. I don't remember much more about it,
others could probably provide more pointers.
--
Gonzalo A. Diethelm
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
