From: "Skip Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> This question is a best practices question.
>
> How are users of Turbine dealing with actions where all or none
transactions
> would be desired?
>
> For instance, I have an action that needs to add something to one of my
> database tables, and then perform several operations on the turbine
> user/security database tables.  If one of these steps fail, then I would
> like the whole action to fail, and roll back.  This doesn't seem like a
> unique problem, so I was wondering what kind of solutions people had.

The current security implementation does not use transactions.  I still
haven't got around to posting my hack/patch to overcome the problem
highlighted in the extend-user-howto, but further work is necessary to
enable transactions.

>
> Skip
>

Scott


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to