Subhash Sankuratripati wrote: > > Hello, > I would like to use torque(w/out turbine) in our > project and would run it in either websphere or a > weblogic application server.. > > I have a few questions that I would appreciate if you > guys could answer.. > > o) Has any body used torque with Entity Beans, using > torque as the Bean managed persistence enabler?. It > can be done, but is it worth it?. > > o) Does it pool the Base objects, or does it create > them every time?.
torque-3.0 has Managers which use JCS (from turbine-stratum) to cache the objects. Pooling has not been added. > > o) Are there any other alternatives to storing the > password in the properties file itself?. I have been working on this, though when I started there was not an open source connection pool available as a standalone product. I started commons-sandbox/jdbc2pool to create such a pool. There are two versions one based on torque's current pool and one based on dbcp. There is also a Datasource /ObjectFactory arrangement in dbcp that can work though it does not currently implement PreparedStatement pooling. As these alternatives now exist, I have merged the branch for separating the connection pool back into my working copy. I plan to commit this after 3.0 final is tagged. It would probably be enough of a change to get a quick 3.1. > > o) Is there any specific reason why the default code > generation for selects does not use doPSSelect, and > does the doSelect instead?. I have a read in the mail > list archives that the best way to use select > statements is to change the doselect() call to a > dopsselect() call > Changing the default to doPSSelect would be good. Especially given prepared statment pooling. > o) This is my managers question :-) :Does it have any > known issues with performance under heavy loads?. > no. > o) Also which version of torque is really independent > of turbine?. is the 3.0b1 or the 2.1?. I could get the > 2.1 version of the file from the turbine release > directory. > 3.0 > o) Does torque have any transaction manager of its > own? from the looks of it, it looks like it is not. > no > Thanks in advance, -Subhash. > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage > http://sports.yahoo.com/ > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
