> was >1.3MB.. My simple jdbc-sql-browser shows me a "[B@12345", just > > like with a real blob.. > > This indeed is a very bad thing and I will have to use a separate > > table for my raw-field. > > > > Thanks for the hint! > > Is there any Torque change that needs to come out of this discussion?
Not much that can be done about it short of fixing the underlying village code to work properly with LOBs, which would be heavily db dependent. RAW columns seem to be much more portable at the DB level. It seems to be mostly a schema thing--when you make a schema, isolate RAW columns by themselves. -- Bill -- Bill -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
