Ben Peter wrote: > > Hi, > > I posted the following message to turbine-dev five days ago but have not > received any answer. I do not know wheter this is because it doesn't belong in > that mailing list or because my questions are so obviously stupid. > > I try again here: > > All, > > I am playing aroung with torque 3.0-b1, and have found several things that at > least are not in-sync with the docs. > > As I try not to unnerve busy people (that are even busy writing software that I > like quite a lot), I was going to check whether the issues I found are covered > in issue tracking already. > > As I understand, the scarab setup on nagoya:8080 is the issue tracker currently > in use, but I found it rather confusing: > > - there seem to be no issues reported against torque at all,
Scarab has just recently been installed and old bugs have not been ported yet. (Jason asked me to go through and close any old issues, but I have not done that, the bugzilla->scarab import is still being worked on as well. > - it seems that issues cannot be reported against a > named version / branch (only by naming it in the description) These attributes have not been added yet. Feel free to include in the description. > - the functional area attribute lists `UI', `Setup', and `Help' > as possibilities, which do not seem to fit for torque Again, the default attributes are still pretty much in place. Ignore any that seem irrelevant. john mcnally -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
