On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 02:09, Nikhil G. Daddikar wrote: > Folks, > > I need to have my own implementation of User. I looked at the source > code and found that the security service is already decoupled from the > User system, so all that needs to be done is to implement User and > UserManager.
Nice ahh ! > > However there is one more thing. We don't use Torque and hence no > Base/Peer combos for User. However Security says (according to > configuration file and documentation) that I have to implement the > UserPeer (in om.security.peer) interface. But I looked at the source > code and UserPeer is not used at all. are you sure ? use grep UserPeer * -r > > Am I missing something here? > Is it possible to use Security Service if my user implementation > doesn't use torque? Yes ! > > Also any real life experiences in this will be greatly appreciated. There are many aproaches, in general you have to implement User, UserManager and UserPeer ( I think ) , change TurbineTables to reference your USER_TABLE. I usually have a skeletal implementation for these classes ( see Efective Java ISBN0201310058 ITEM 16 ) -- Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz IT - Inter Business Tecnologia e Servicos (IB) http://www.ibnetwork.com.br -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
