I'd just like to reply to this after trying some things, but I would
appreciate anyone "InTheKnow" with Intake to see if this is stupid.
our Beans have a get/setId() property using Longs.
I've got Intake now to use the Id field as a NumberKey (which is backed by a
BigDecimal type). I have then used the mapToProperty attribute of the
<field> to specify separate a separate getter/setter methods that take a
NumberKey, and simply set or soak the BigDecimal value out of it.
e.g:
<field name="Id" key="i" type="NumberKey" mapToProperty="BigId">
<rule name="minLength" value="1">ID field must be specified</rule>
</field>
and in my bean class:
public void setBigId(NumberKey key)
{
setId(key.getBigDecimal().longValue());
}
public NumberKey getBigId() { return new NumberKey(getId());}
Now I believe that I am 'losing' the precision of the BigDecimal, but only
down to the long's maximum, and since we've chosen long type as our key, we
should be right (up to the point where the long type runs out of numbers,
cross fingers).
Anyone see any issues with that? A quick yes/no would be cool thanks. Hats
off to the entire Turbine dev team, this is one cooool product.
cheers,
Paul Smith
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 1:29 PM
To: Turbine Users List (E-mail)
Subject: Intake: FieldFactory: long type
Does anyone know if the FieldFactory correctly handles the long type?
TDK 2.1 FieldFactory.java does not, and I've just downloaded
turbine-2.2-b1-src.zip and that does not seem to have long either?
Help. All our Beans ID fields are long type.
cheers,
paul smith
--==[(ps)]==--
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
