+1 I too have been staying back on 2.1 because of the issues relating to the security service.
Scott > From: Martin Poeschl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Turbine Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 18:54:19 +0200 > To: Turbine Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, turbine-user > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [vote] Turbine 2.2 release > > Turbine 2.1 was released more than a year ago. > I think it's time for 2.2 ;-) > > status: > > 2.2-dev works with the decoupled version of torque except for the security > service. > 2.2-dev works with some parts of fulcrum (i'm using fulcrums xml-rpc service) > > plan: > > *) change the security service to use the decoupled torque and remove the > coupled version > + the coupled version has some problems which are fixed in the coupled > version > + the coupled version is unmaintained > + it will be easier to change to turbine-3 > - this will brake backwards compatibility!! (package names, Vector -> List) > > <quote> > > FYI, the List->Vector change in Scarab only took me about an hour total, > so, > for those of you waiting, it won't be that bad of an upgrade. > > -jon > > </quote> :-)) > > > *) leave the services as they are (at least for turbine 2.2) > - it would be hard to make turbine 2.2 work with fulcrum > - > > *) release Torque 3.0-b3 and Turbine 2.2-b2 by the end of the week > > *) release Torque 3.0 and Turbine 2.2 2 weeks later (26th july) > (or Torque b4 and turbine b3 .. depends on feedback) > > i x-post this mail to get additional feedback from the user list :-) > > martin > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
