Yes!  I agree.

On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Miessbrandt Gunter wrote:

> I think a very important item for the todo-list is a documentation
> about the process moving a T2.1-webapp to T2.2, because of the decoupled
> 
> torque and fulcrum.
> 
> Gunter
> 
> > -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Scott Eade [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. September 2002 13:25
> > An: turbine-user
> > Betreff: Re: When will TDK 2.2 be released?
> > 
> > 
> > > From: Martin Poeschl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > 
> > > there is no release date planned :-(
> > > but you should definitly start with 2.2 and report any problems!!
> > > 
> > > 2.2 works fine for my apps, but we need more testing before a final 
> > > release
> > > 
> > > martin
> > 
> > Martin,
> > 
> > Surely there must be some kind of features based target for a 
> > 2.2 release, otherwise there will only ever be 2.2 beta 
> > releases until the end of time.
> > 
> > I think we need to come up with a list of requirements that 
> > need to be met in order to declare a turbine/tdk 2.2 final 
> > release.  I would imagine this list might include:
> > 
> > 1. A release of torque 3.0 final (we need to start the same 
> > discussion on the torque-dev list with respect to torque). 2. 
> > A release of maven 1.0 final (I would imagine the maven guys 
> > have some fairly specific criteria in mind for their 1.0 release).
> > 
> > I would like to add my personal bugbear to the list:
> > 
> > 3. A working, documented solution to the requirement to 
> > extend the turbine_user table.
> > 
> > Surely there is room for a process here?  Why can't the 
> > committers and users of turbine nominate the requirements for 
> > a 2.2 final release (features, fixes, issues, etc.)  These 
> > can be voted upon individually and the accepted ones added 
> > into the todo page on the turbine-2 site.  This would provide 
> > something for the contributors to work towards and a better 
> > answer to the "when will turbine 2.2 be released?" question 
> > than "nothing is planned".
> > 
> > I am happy to try and coordinate some of this, but if 
> > anything is going to be done then the committers and users of 
> > turbine need to step forward with their lists of critical 
> > requirements for the 2.2 release.
> > 
> > What do you believe are the things that need to be done 
> > before a turbine/tdk 2.2 final release can be realized?
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > Scott
> > -- 
> > Scott Eade
> > Backstage Technologies Pty. Ltd. http://www.backstagetech.com.au
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> > <mailto:turbine-user-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For 
> > additional commands, 
> > e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> 


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to