> From: "C.P. Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > So, to re-iterate, has anyone successfully replaced the security model > in turbine, and what dangers should I be aware of?
Take a look at the proposals directory in Fulcrum cvs: http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-turbine-fulcrum/proposals/ This contains a database security service provided by Henning that can be dropped in to replace the one included in fulcrum (replacing what is presumably a copy of the service that is built into turbine 2.2bx). I don't know if you can extend this for your purposes, but in any case it should provide you with a good example of replacing the security service (there has been some discussion of this on the mailing lists in the last month or so (possibly turbine-dev) so you may like to check the archive). Fulcrum is the start of a process that externalises the services that are included in turbine into a separate project so that they can be used elsewhere (e.g. In turbine 3). Please note that the future of Fulcrum is not entirely clear - it will probably move forward after the turbine 2.2 release (hopefully using the proposed db_security_service). Cheers, Scott -- Scott Eade Backstage Technologies Pty. Ltd. http://www.backstagetech.com.au -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
